Exercise 1: Model Validation Framework Prompt Engineering

Objective:

Learn to craft effective prompts for GenAI to assist with developing comprehensive model validation frameworks.

Background:

Model Risk Managers are responsible for ensuring that models used in financial institutions are properly validated and monitored. A key challenge is developing robust validation frameworks that address all aspects of model risk.

Exercise:

1. Scenario:

You need to develop or enhance your institution's model validation framework to ensure it meets regulatory expectations and industry best practices.

2. Basic Prompt Example:

What should be included in a model validation framework?

3. Prompt Improvement Activity:

  • Identify the limitations of the basic prompt (lack of specificity, context, and structure)
  • Add details about your institution's model landscape and regulatory requirements
  • Include information about validation objectives and stakeholders
  • Request a structured framework with specific validation components and processes

4. Advanced Prompt Template:

I am a Model Risk Manager at a [size/type] financial institution developing a comprehensive model validation framework. Our model landscape includes:

- Model inventory: Approximately [number] models across [categories]
- Model complexity: [range from simple to highly complex]
- Critical models: [number] models classified as high-risk/critical
- Model uses: [credit decisioning, pricing, stress testing, AML, etc.]
- Modeling techniques: [statistical, machine learning, AI, etc.]
- Regulatory requirements: [SR 11-7, OCC 2011-12, TRIM, etc.]

The objectives of our model validation framework are to:
- Ensure models are conceptually sound and performing as intended
- Identify and mitigate model limitations and weaknesses
- Meet regulatory expectations for model risk management
- Establish consistent validation standards across the organization
- Support effective challenge of model development and assumptions
- Provide clear guidance for model owners and validators

Please help me develop a comprehensive model validation framework by:

1. Outlining the key components of an effective framework:
   - Governance structure and roles/responsibilities
   - Model risk tiering methodology
   - Validation scope and depth requirements by tier
   - Independence requirements for validators
   - Documentation standards
   - Validation lifecycle management
   - Validation tools and techniques

2. For each validation component, provide detailed guidance on:
   - Conceptual soundness assessment
   - Data quality and representativeness review
   - Implementation verification
   - Outcomes analysis and benchmarking
   - Ongoing monitoring requirements
   - Periodic review standards
   - Issue management and remediation

3. Recommending specific validation approaches for:
   - Traditional statistical models
   - Machine learning models
   - Vendor models
   - Models using alternative data
   - Models with limited data
   - Qualitative models and frameworks

4. Suggesting a validation reporting framework:
   - Executive summary components
   - Technical assessment details
   - Findings classification methodology
   - Remediation planning and tracking
   - Effective communication to stakeholders
   - Regulatory documentation requirements

Format your response as a structured model validation framework that I can present to our Model Risk Committee and use to guide our validation program.

5. Evaluation Criteria:

  • Does the prompt clearly describe the institution's model landscape and regulatory context?
  • Does it articulate the objectives of the validation framework?
  • Does it request comprehensive components covering all aspects of validation?
  • Does it ask for specific approaches for different model types?

6. Practice Activity:

Create your own advanced prompt for model validation framework development related to:

  1. AI/ML models with specific focus on explainability
  2. Vendor models with limited transparency
  3. Models used for regulatory stress testing

Exercise 2: Model Risk Assessment Prompt Engineering

Objective:

Develop skills to craft prompts that help create effective model risk assessment methodologies.

Background:

Model Risk Managers must assess and quantify risks associated with models to prioritize validation efforts and mitigation strategies. A key challenge is developing a comprehensive risk assessment approach that considers all relevant risk factors.

Exercise:

1. Scenario:

You need to develop or enhance your institution's model risk assessment methodology to better identify, measure, and prioritize model risks.

2. Basic Prompt Example:

How do we assess model risk?

3. Prompt Improvement Activity:

  • Identify the weaknesses in the basic prompt
  • Add specificity about your model ecosystem and risk factors
  • Include context about stakeholder expectations and constraints
  • Request a structured methodology with specific assessment criteria and processes

4. Advanced Prompt Template:

I am a Model Risk Manager at a [size/type] financial institution developing/enhancing our model risk assessment methodology. Our current situation includes:

Model ecosystem:
- Types of models: [credit, market, operational, financial crime, etc.]
- Model complexity spectrum: [rule-based to advanced AI/ML]
- Model uses: [decision-making, reporting, forecasting, etc.]
- Development sources: [internal, vendor, hybrid approaches]
- Model interdependencies: [model chains, shared data sources]

Risk considerations:
- Financial impact of model errors
- Regulatory compliance requirements
- Reputational risk factors
- Operational dependencies
- Model complexity and opacity
- Data quality and availability
- Implementation and use controls

Current challenges:
- [e.g., Inconsistent risk assessment across model types]
- [e.g., Difficulty quantifying certain risk dimensions]
- [e.g., Balancing depth of assessment with resource constraints]
- [e.g., Addressing emerging risks from new modeling techniques]

Please help me develop a comprehensive model risk assessment methodology by:

1. Outlining a structured risk assessment framework:
   - Key risk dimensions to evaluate
   - Quantitative and qualitative assessment approaches
   - Scoring methodology and scales
   - Risk tiering and classification approach
   - Assessment frequency and triggers
   - Roles and responsibilities in the assessment process

2. For each risk dimension, suggest:
   - Specific assessment criteria
   - Measurement approaches and metrics
   - Information sources and evidence requirements
   - Common pitfalls and how to avoid them
   - Benchmarking considerations

3. Recommending tailored assessment approaches for:
   - Different model types (statistical, ML/AI, qualitative)
   - Different model uses (decisioning, reporting, forecasting)
   - Different development sources (internal, vendor, hybrid)
   - Models with varying levels of complexity and materiality
   - New models vs. existing models

4. Providing implementation guidance:
   - Assessment tools and templates
   - Documentation requirements
   - Governance and approval processes
   - Integration with model inventory
   - Reporting and escalation procedures
   - Continuous improvement mechanisms

Format your response as a structured model risk assessment methodology that balances comprehensiveness with practical implementation considerations.

5. Evaluation Criteria:

  • Does the prompt clearly describe the model ecosystem and risk considerations?
  • Does it articulate current challenges and constraints?
  • Does it request a comprehensive framework with specific assessment criteria?
  • Does it ask for tailored approaches for different model types and uses?

6. Practice Activity:

Create your own advanced prompt for model risk assessment related to:

  1. AI/ML models with specific focus on ethical considerations
  2. Models used for consumer-facing decisions
  3. Models with significant data limitations

Exercise 3: Model Monitoring and Performance Tracking Prompt Engineering

Objective:

Learn to craft prompts that help design effective model monitoring and performance tracking frameworks.

Background:

Model Risk Managers must establish robust monitoring mechanisms to ensure models continue to perform as expected over time. A key challenge is designing monitoring approaches that detect performance deterioration and emerging issues promptly.

Exercise:

1. Scenario:

You need to enhance your institution's model monitoring and performance tracking framework to improve ongoing oversight of model performance.

2. Basic Prompt Example:

How should we monitor our models?

3. Prompt Improvement Activity:

  • Identify the limitations of the basic prompt
  • Add specificity about your model types and performance concerns
  • Include context about monitoring objectives and constraints
  • Request a comprehensive monitoring framework with specific metrics and processes

4. Advanced Prompt Template:

I am a Model Risk Manager at a [size/type] financial institution enhancing our model monitoring and performance tracking framework. Our current situation includes:

Model portfolio:
- Credit risk models (scoring, PD/LGD/EAD, CECL, stress testing)
- Market risk models (VaR, pricing, hedging)
- Operational risk models
- AML/fraud detection models
- Behavioral models (prepayment, deposit pricing)
- [Other relevant model types]

Monitoring challenges:
- [e.g., Varying data availability across model types]
- [e.g., Determining appropriate monitoring frequency]
- [e.g., Setting meaningful thresholds for investigation]
- [e.g., Addressing seasonal patterns and regime shifts]
- [e.g., Resource constraints for monitoring activities]

Monitoring objectives:
- Detect model performance deterioration promptly
- Identify data drift and population shifts
- Ensure continued alignment with business objectives
- Support regulatory compliance requirements
- Optimize model update and recalibration cycles
- Provide early warning of emerging issues

Please help me design a comprehensive model monitoring and performance tracking framework by:

1. Outlining key components of an effective monitoring program:
   - Monitoring governance and oversight
   - Performance metric selection methodology
   - Threshold setting approaches
   - Monitoring frequency determination
   - Escalation and response protocols
   - Documentation and reporting standards

2. For each major model type, recommend:
   - Specific performance metrics and indicators
   - Data requirements and sources
   - Appropriate monitoring frequency
   - Threshold setting considerations
   - Benchmark and challenger approaches
   - Visualization and reporting techniques

3. Suggesting specialized monitoring approaches for:
   - Machine learning and AI models
   - Models with limited performance data
   - Models subject to significant regime changes
   - Vendor models with black-box components
   - Models with complex interdependencies
   - Models with high regulatory scrutiny

4. Providing implementation guidance on:
   - Automation opportunities and tools
   - Resource allocation and prioritization
   - Integration with model inventory systems
   - Roles and responsibilities
   - Regulatory documentation requirements
   - Continuous improvement processes

Format your response as a comprehensive model monitoring framework that balances rigor with practical implementation considerations and resource constraints.

5. Evaluation Criteria:

  • Does the prompt clearly describe the model portfolio and monitoring challenges?
  • Does it articulate monitoring objectives and constraints?
  • Does it request specific monitoring approaches for different model types?
  • Does it ask for practical implementation guidance and resource considerations?

6. Practice Activity:

Create your own advanced prompt for model monitoring related to:

  1. Credit models during economic uncertainty
  2. AI/ML models with potential for algorithmic bias
  3. Models with complex interdependencies